The Construction

In detriment of a narrative that prioritized the construction of a truth objective elaborated, the return of the narrative in our current scene, if valley of indications for the construction of one third time, a ficcional moment, a creative invention of the historian, that by means of one intrigues, reconfigures imaginarily the past, longing for to substitute it. The historian if valley of tests carefully selected and made use in a net of combinations and analogies in order to produce one meaning, much more that to only explain, he operates as speech of authority of the researcher. It was with the advent of modernity and its belief in the rational ways of explanation of the Real, that the narrative enters in decline, transferred to establish it a new positioning for the historian, that would have to be absented total of its writing, most faithful to the sources, these that would have to pass for the bolter of the oficialidade. The use of rhetorical and literary devices was abolished of the academies, seen the maintenance of the cientificidade character that all permeava the speech of the time. Thus, the proper birth of history, while it disciplines, was pautou in what it never would have to be: myth, fbula or fiction, everything what not that it did not allow to the objetividade and the rationality defended for effective the academic standards then. The practical historiogrfica would have if to move away from the said language literary, the ficcionais speeches and the used linguistic devices in the elaboration of the texts, that would have to be guided by a simple language, clear and concise, many times come back only toward the reproduction of the document, that would have to be written and official. This way of boarding of History hardly passed to be criticized years later, having in the School of the Analles one of the main centers of problematizao and confrontation. .